By Subash Agarwal, Advocate
1. Introduction
This year big corporate have borne
the brunt of additional revenue mobilization exercise of the Finance Minister.
Chidu has slapped a surcharge of 10% on corporates having taxable income above
Rs. 10 crores. Simultaneously, 10% surcharge has also been imposed on an
already high Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) of 15%. This was one of the prime
factor responsible for 290-point in the stock market on the budget eve.
The corporates shall be caught in a
catch 22 situation- either to prune dividend and get investor unfriendly image
or pay higher income tax and reduce the amount transferable to the
shareholders' fund, which itself is utilised for the issue of bonus shares.
2. A simple mechanism
advised by the Supreme Court
There is a simple way out of this
tight situation - the mechanism of buy back of shares, a remedy which the
Hon'ble Supreme Court has unwittingly provided to the corporates shuddering
with the thought of dividend tax outgo by making the following observations way
back in 1965 in Punjab Distilling
Industries Ltd. v. CIT 57 ITR 1-
" A company may, on the pretext of reducing its capital, utilise its
accumulated profits to pay back to the shareholders the whole or part of the
paid up amounts on the shares. A shareholder, though in form gets back the
whole or a part of the capital contributed by him, in effect he gets a share of
the accumulated profits, which if a straight forward course was followed, he
should have received as dividend. This is a division of profits under the guise
of division of capital, a distribution of profits under the colour of reduction
of capital."
3. Amendments made by Finance
Act, 1999
Following amendments were made in the
statute by the Finance Act, 1999 that unsettled the settled position as
pronounced by the Supreme Court-
(i)
Amendment in Section 2 (22) (iv): Dividend
does not include any payment made by a company on purchase of its own shares
from a share holder as per section 77A of the Companies Act. (w.e.f..
01.04.2000)
(ii)
Amendment in Section 46A: Where
consideration is received from a company for purchase of its own shares, there
is deemed capital gains, being the difference between the cost of acquisition
and the value of consideration (w.e.f. 01.04.2000).
(iii)
Amendment in Section 115-O: DDT is to
be paid by a company. (amendment made earlier)
It appears that the aforesaid
amendment was made way back in 1999 by the Finance Act, 1999 by the government
oblivious of the above-mentioned Supreme Court judgement, which was lying
buried in the Income –Tax Reports. In the absence of the above amendments, the
consideration amount received on the buy-back could very well have been treated
as dividend as per the interpretation of Supreme Court in the judgement
mentioned above, thus, exigible to DDT u/s 115-O.
4. Corporates can laugh all
the way to the Bank and avoid DDT.
The amendment made by the government
by inserting section 46 A and section 2(22)(iv) in the Income-tax Act, 1961
that the consideration received on the buy-back of shares by the shareholders shall
attract capital gains tax in the hands of shareholders and the word dividend
does not include any payment made by a company on purchase of its own shares
from the shareholders in accordance with the provisions of section 77A of the
Companies Act, 1956 by the Finance Act, 1999 enables companies to merrily
distribute the accumulated profits in the form of buy back of shares on a
proportionate basis to the shareholders which as per the Supreme Court
judgement could have been construed as " deemed dividend" and escape
paying dividend tax. The reduction in capital can subsequently be replenished
by issue of bonus shares and the whole process may be repeated with regularity.
Under section 77A(8) of the Companies Act, 1956, though further issue of shares
is not allowed within a period of 24 months, issue of bonus shares is exempt
from its purview. The shareholders on the other hand will also reap a bonanza
if the shares bought back were held for more than one year, the difference
between the amount received on buy back and the cost of shares shall be treated
as long term capital gains in the hands of shareholders attracting little or
zero tax in their hands.
5. Finance Bill, 2013 leaves
the window open.
Proposed
Law:
(i)
A new chapter XII-DA is proposed to be inserted.
(ii)
A company will be liable to pay additional tax @ 20%
of the distributed income.
(iii) The
distributed income will be computed as under-
Rs.
Consideration paid
Less: Sum received at the time of issue of shares
Less: Sum received at the time of issue of shares
(iv)
New Section 10(34A): Income arising
to a shareholder on account of buy back of unlisted shares exempt
from tax.
(v)
Section 46A : Remains on the Statute
Book. Income arising on buy-back of listed shares to be chargeable to capital gains tax, sale
consideration received on buy-back being treated as deemed sale consideration.
(vi)
Chapter XII-D : Inserted
from effect from 01.06.2013 providing for and containing provisions additional
tax on distribution of income of domestic company for buy- back of unlisted shares.
6. Conclusion
The
proposed amendment affects the buy-back of unlisted shares only and not
the quoted shares. The window remains open for the listed companies to resort
to tax planning for avoiding DDT by the mechanism of buy-back of shares. They
can prune / forego dividend payments but distribute the largesse by first
declaring bonus shares and then buying back the shares and in the process
distributing cash to the shareholders in a roundabout fashion.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.